Wednesday, 16 November 2011

REFLECTION

Through this very exquisite and challenging learning experience of blogging, I have learnt many lessons.
  1. The importance of knowing and analyzing the situational and cultural context before document designing.
  2. The ethical considerations behind printings and advertising should be concentrated in order to prevent pull backs.
  3. Change is inevitable; the emerging trends in the new media should not be neglected but embraced as opportunities for improvements towards generalization.
  4. Research is vital for any piece of work written here.
  5. The importance and the ethical principles to follow through citations and sourcing to prevent copyright issues and threats.
  6. The wide windows of opportunities in the blogosphere are opened to anyone willing to accept and learn.
  7. The different placements and layout of images and words in a document depicts different meanings.
Without going through this course, I would have never gained this handful of knowledge. This course is definitely worth taking, being both interesting and challenging at the same time.

E-TEXTBOOKS VS THE CONVENTIONAL TEXTBOOK

Alexa Capeloto’s article titled “HowE-textbooks, Online Modules Could Keep Journalism Education Current spurred many questions in my head.

Firstly, I would express the preference of students, be it E-textbooks or the conventional one. Then, I would provide my own opinions and thought to this matter.

Statistics have shown that though there is an increase in online modules and E-textbooks, students find it harder to accept this new trend as compared to other emerging trends like reading news through the internet.


Example of Print Textbook

Source: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jDgBRNQyPlk/TjmrszRDYbI


Example of E-book

Source: http://www.prlog.org/11534825-ipad-ebook-publishing-services.jpg

According to Anderson (2010), a research conducted from the National Association of College Stores (NACS) showed:
  • “74% of college students preferred print over digital.”
  • “56% out of the 13% who purchased electronic books only did so because the course required.”

Woody, Daniel & Baker (2010) expressed in their article that:
  • “The experience of reading e-books is not equivalent to reading textbooks.”
  • “Students still preferred using print texts for learning.”
  • “Although hyperlinks are available in e-books, report shows that students were not more likely use it.”
  • “The ‘Strengths’ of the e-books like strong visual and interactive elements are not used to their full potential by the participants of this survey.”


Waters(2011) wrote that the Book Industry Study Group Survey (BISG) showed:
  • “75% of college students prefer the ‘feel’ of reading from printed texts’
  • “only a mere 12% of survey participants preferred e-books”


Nielsen’s(2010) research on ipad usability showed:
  • “there is an improvement in the apps”
  • “new and emerging usability problems are found for example the navigation overload”
  • “reading experience still does not exceed the reading from PC monitors”


According to Nielsen (2010) from the usability survey between the ipad and the kindle, both mediums are found to be less appealing than reading from actual books.

I truly believe that if the ipad and kindle reading experience has not improved, there will be a slower growth in the chances of people adapting to reading e-books. The trend of e-books and online module will still increase through its numerous benefits, but it all ultimately boils down to the preference of most readers. Perhaps, the old may still be the best. 


Reference List
Anderson, K 2010, Do Students Really Prefer Print Books to E-Books?, Scholarly Kitchen, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/11/03/students-prefer-print-books-to-e-books-not-because-of-the-medium/>

Capeloto, A 2011,  How E-textbooks, Online Modules Could Keep Journalism Education Current, PBS- Media Shift, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2011/08/how-e-textbooks-online-modules-could-keep-journalism-education-current237.html>

Nielsen, J 2010, Ipad and Kindle Reading Speeds, Use It, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ipad-kindle-reading.html>

Waters, A 2011, Survey Finds College Students Prefer Their Textbooks in Print, Hacked Education, News, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://www.hackeducation.com/2011/01/07/survey-finds-college-students-prefer-their-textbooks-in-print/>

Woody, W.D., Daniel , D.B., & Baker, C.A 2010, ‘E-Books or Textbooks: Students Prefer Textbooks’, Journal of Computers & Education, Vol. 55, No.1, pp. 945-848.

Cable TV Will NOT Be King Forever

The article “85% of Media Websites Now Use Online Videoto Cover News” by Megan O’Neill can be seen as an emerging trend this era.

This blog post will be dedicated to the audiences’ preferences, the statistics on changing trends and the issues regarding its contents.

Firstly, this is an example of how an online video – news is played in media websites like YouTube.com

Example of An Online Video

Online video is getting very popular as seen from the below statistics through results generated from the Pew Internet & American Life research:  
  • “71% of online adults now use video-sharing sites, 2011.”
  • “Video-sharing sites usage has had a steady increase over time, from 2006 to 2011.”
  • “Rural areas have shown the most significant increase over time, from 2006 to 2011.”
  • “Video Watching grows across all ages, from 2006 to 2009.”
  • “Video-sharing sites usage doubles from 2006 to 2009”


Source: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Video-sharing-sites/


Source: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Video-

Source: http://pewresearch.org/assets/publications/1294-3.jpg

Source: http://pewresearch.org/assets/publications/1294-1.jpg


It is clear that audiences now prefer the easy accessibility and well detailed information at quick access provided through the internet. Different genres have different contents. The contents in online videos may exceed those of cable TV, which results in the emerging trend.
Videos online have music clips, shorter fragments, have behind the scene clips, highlights, short, quick but information filled.

Besides that, videos online promotes interactivity like voting, chatting and commenting, ticketing, on-demand downloads, and other additional information on programs unlike the conventional TV.

According to Spangler (2011), Nielsen’s report on media consumption noted that 48% of US consumers watch videos and news online however TV remains “the great American pastime”.  This is seen to be true as O’Dell’s article showed PEW Internet research stating than TV is still the main source of news, followed by the internet, with newspapers coming in third. 

Source: http://6.mshcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/news-source.jpg

Though TV is still King, the emerging trend of online video news used by media websites has seen a steady increase through the years. Media planners have to find the balance point in order to let both genres co-exist together, satisfying different generation’s needs.

Lastly, this shift in genre liking should be seen as an opportunity to venture further into the online video world instead of a threat to cable TV organizations. 


Reference List
O’Dell, J 2011, For the First Time, More People Get News Online Than From Newspapers, Mashable.com, viewed 11 November 2011,<http://mashable.com/2011/03/15/online-versus-newspaper-news/>

O’Neill, M 2011, 85% of Media Websites Now Use Online Video to Cover News, Social Times.com, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://socialtimes.com/85-of-media-websites-now-use-online-video-to-cover-news_b60505>

Spangler, T 2011, Half of Americans Watch Online Video: Nielsen – Traditional TV Still King, with Monthly viewing up 1.9% in Q2, Multichannel News, viewed 11 November 2011, < http://www.multichannel.com/article/475509-Half_Of_Americans_Watch_Online_Video_Nielsen.php>

UNDERSTANDING SITUATIONAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS ARE IMPORTANT


Document designers, advertisers and media related parties have to all understand a culture in order to fulfill the demands of the audiences and prevent further provocation.

The two ads mentioned in the article are:

THE RAMADAN AD BY 8TV 2011


THE RAMADAN AD BY TV3 2010


Kress & van Leeuwen (1998) explained that readers from different cultural backgrounds are perceived to read differently. In this case, people can also perceive the message of the advertisement differently, which rose to the disagreement of the community in Malaysia.

The audience may misunderstand the message because they do not understand the cultural content in the view of those celebrating Ramadan, as Walsh (2006) explained that readers have to understand the social purpose and its cultural content, to understand the real meaning behind.

Shriver (1997) notes the importance of understanding different cultures as document designers. The author states that the interpretation of the audience is highly influenced by the specific local culture in. In this case, the different races of Malaysia have different culture backgrounds, thus, perceiving the advertisement differently.

Other countries besides Malaysia are also guilty of racist advertisements.

For Example:

SONY’s ADVERTISEMENT IN USA 2006


THE KFC ADVERTISEMENT IN USA 2009


According to the Advertising Standards Authority Malaysia (ASA) - Code of Advertising Practices Section 1.3 states:
  • “Advertisements must not identify or type-cast each particular racial group or sex with vocations, traditional values and backgrounds”.

The Association of Accredited Advertising Agents Malaysia (AAAA)- Standard Code of Conducts to the general public include:
  • “be mindful of public sensitivities before using potentially offensive and distasteful material, to ensure against negative results from their use.”
  • “be responsible in the portrayal of race, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability, traditional values and region.”


Therefore, advertisers have to be more aware of the possible implications that come with the insensitivity shown in advertisements. Media parties have to understand the social and cultural context of the environment in to prevent pull-backs of advertisements in the future.

Click here to view more racist advertisements that got pulled back.

Say no to RACIST ADVERTISEMENTS!



Reference List
Association of Accredited Advertising Agents Malaysia (AAAA)- Standard Code of Conducts, Association of Accredited Advertising Agents Malaysia (AAAA), viewed 11 November 2011, < http://www.aaaa.org.my/association/standard_conduct.html>

Advertising Standards Authority Malaysia (ASA) - Code of Advertising Practices , Advertising Standards Authority Malaysia (ASA), viewed 11 November 2011, < http://www.unicef.org/malaysia/Code-of-Advertising-Practice.pdf>

Jack, n.d. 25 Most Racist Advertisements and Commercials, AdSavvy.com, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://www.adsavvy.org/25-most-racist-advertisements-and-commercials/>

Kress, G & van Leeuwen, T, 1998, Front Pages: (the critical) Analysis of Newspaper Layout, Blackwell, Oxford.

Shriver, K.A. 1997, Chapter 6 in Dynamics in Document Design, John Wiley, New York, USA.

Walsh, M 2006, ‘Textual Shift’ – Examining the Reading Process with Print, Visual and Multimodal Texts,  Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, Vol.29, No.1, pp.24-37.

Yow, H.C. 2011, Media Prima Pulls Out ‘Racist’ Ramadan Ads, Malaysian Insider, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/print/malaysia/media-prima-pulls-out-racist-ramadan-ads/>

Tablet News VS Print


Chris Trotter’s article titled Ipad-Only NewspaperFurthers Media Trend” has provoked my curiosity to further venture into this idea.
Change is inevitable for media organizations and resistance of change will only throw these unwilling organizations into the deeper end as Gen Y increases in population, so does the popularity of reading news from tablets. 


Firstly, an example of print newspaper and  a tablet newspaper.

Print Newspaper
Source: http://www.eldergadget.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Samsung-Tablet-Newspaper.jpg

Tablet Newspaper

Source: http://seethesite.name/kindle2/newspapers


What do most audiences say about this switch in genre?
In Technolog on MSNBC.com, Pew Research Centre provided the following statistics:
  • “28% of American say the loss of local newspaper would cause major impact on the ability to keep up with local information.”
  • “30% say it would have a minor impact.”
  • “39% say the loss of the newspaper would have no impact”

Rosensteil &Mitchell (2011) from the Pew Research Centre’s Project for Excellence in Journalism noted a survey done showing:
  • “47% of Americans  now get news from local mobile devices or tablets”
  • “Cable news is shrinking especially in its median audience”

Local newspapers have degraded in providing information because the audiences now are demanding for correct, sufficient yet fast information. News happening  and being reported straight at the moment is new, any news a few hours later is considered old news in its media life. Newspapers take longer processing time which decreases its favorability.

As of January 2011, Internet is now second to Television when it comes to weather reports, breaking news, and traffic updates. 

Source: http://www.frankwbaker.com/mediau9.jpg

Source: http://www.frankwbaker.com/w-pew296--300x416--300x416.jpg

The younger the viewers are, the more welcoming the internet era is, which leads to more tablet viewing. Local news and information sources are mostly dominated by the internet, both reading through tablets or desktops. 

Source: http://www.frankwbaker.com/mediau10.jpg

According to Klein (2011) print fulfills a different need, readers want the experience of holding and flipping through pages which provides both intellectual and leisure experiences, which may not be found in digital devices. 

I however, feel that digital devices provide easier accessibility. Walsh (2006) expresses the importance of how technological differences assist readers and maintains a reader’s interest. The easier accessibility to other references from hyperlinks within the tablet news, links to various other media tools increases the chances of in-depth understanding as compared to reading plainly from printed newspapers.

My Opinion
I believe that it is important to find a balance point between both print and tablet because both mediums satisfy different needs of different readers, and both mediums should be allowed to co-exist together. 



Reference List:
Klein, JE 2011, Print Newspapers Have a Place in a Tablet Heavy Future, NiemanLab, viewed 11 November 2011, < http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/02/jason-e-klein-print-newspapers-have-a-place-in-a-tablet-heavy-future/>

Rosensteil, T & Mitchell, A 2011, The State of The News Media- An Annual Report on American Journalism, State of the Media. Org, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://stateofthemedia.org/2011/overview-2/>

Choney, S 2011, Online News Readership Overtakes Newspapers, Technolog on MSNBC.com, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/03/14/6267015-online-news-readership-overtakes-newspapers>

Trotter, C  Ipad-Only  Newspaper Furthers Media Trend, The Cento, viewed 11 November 2011, <http://www.thecento.com/news/2011/feb/17/ipad-only-newspaper-furthers-media-trend/>

Walsh, M 2006, ‘Textual Shift’- Examining the Reading Process with Print, Visual and Multimodal Texts, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, Vol. 29, No.1, pp.24-37.

Friday, 26 August 2011

Document Design : Screen VS Print

Shriver (cited in Whiskey Creek Document Design 2003) explains that document design is an act of combining prose, graphics, typography, to instruct, inform or persuade. 

Hilligoss & Howard (2002) mentioned that in order to communicate with readers, good visual design has to match good writing and not substitute it. Visual communication affects how the readers interact with words, therefore important for writers to note.
This blog and newspaper article will be used to illustrate the differences between print-based and screen-based documents.


The Main Differences:
1.       Writing
Morkes & Nielsen (1997) states that screen documents are more concise, precise, direct, scannable, include summaries and hyperlinks, which can be seen through the point forms used in this blog.
Print-based documents are more formal, expressive, inclusive of pictures and written in full sentences as clearly seen from the above newspaper article.

2.       Design
Walsh (2006) mentioned that screen-based designs include headings, links, images, hyperlinks, which is also evident through this blog.
Unlike screen, print-based has different typography, headlines, large amount of texts (Nielsen 1999) as seen from the above newspaper article.

3.       Reading Paths
According to Walsh (2006), Reading paths of screen-based text are non-linear as there are many reading paths which tend to encourage scanning. Besides that, Nielsen (1999) explains that hands move for information by clicking links on blogs, thus interaction occurs. This is true to this blog of mine, as readers can choose either to read the first post, search for other interested posts.


Walsh (2006) notes the difference with print-based reading paths, by explaining that it is non-linear and includes decoding, responding and comprehending. It also flows sequentially. This is true to the newspaper article above as people will tend to read the blog headings before reading the others.

Other Examples


Reference List:
Hilligoss, S & Howard, T 2002, Visual Communication-A Writer’s Guide, 2nd edn, Longman, USA, viewed 24 August 2011, <http://www.ablongman.com/mycomplab_content/pdf/long_hilligoss.pdf>

Morkes,J & Nielsen, J 1997, Concise, SCANNABLE, and Objective: How to Write for the Web, UseIt.com, viewed 24 August 2011,<http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/writing.html>
Nielsen, J 1999,Differences between Print Design and Web Design, UseIt.com, viewed 24 August 2011,< http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990124.html>

Walsh, M 2006, ‘The “Textual Shift”: Examining the reading Process with Print, Visual and Multimodal Texts’, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol.29, no.1, pp.24-37.

Whiskey Creek Document Design 2003, Dynamics in Document Design by Karen A Shriver, viewed 24 August 2011, <http://www.wcdd.com/dd/reviews/schriver.html>

New Forms of Media Publishing

Mainstream media like newspapers is deteriorating in its popularity ever since the emergence of new media publishing types like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, CNN.news, LinkedIn. Nielsen (2009) states total views of the top newspaper sites increase approximately 27% yearly and claims 20% increase of visits in career development sites. New Media is becoming a very powerful tool.

Uses
1. Enhances communication-expression of opinion, sharing of thought. Plunkett (2006) declares a 500% increase of users in YouTube within the first half of 2006.
2. Information Transmission- (CNN.com) and blogs.
3. Product & Brand Awareness
4. 3R's -Reputation, Revenue, Research - Pollard (2010)

Importance
Saighal (cited in Singh 2011) expresses the importance of media digital as a mainstream communication between businesses and customers, and is vital for innovative marketing in today's scenario.

According to Walsh (2006), Affordances are what is made possible by the modes used, in order to maximize engagement and create particular effects. For example, New Media provides the ability to “show” instead of just “telling”.

Altered Communication
New Media has altered communication in a new media ecosystem can be illustrated through the President of the United States Barack Obama’s excellent use of new media.

Obama uses Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube to communicate with the citizens of America and others worldwide, giving an insight to his personal views regarding current issues and also recordings of his conferences. Besides that, he uses LinkedIn for corporate associates and blogs for readers worldwide.

Communication is no longer one way like how mainstream media was. Feedbacks from citizen’s and voices of opinion are replied to Obama through the same media. More authentic and genuine conversation occurred, serving as an insight to the citizens’ mind.

Examples of New Media used by Barack Obama.






 Example of New Media-News



Reference List
Nielsen Online 2009,Web Traffic To Top 10 Online Newspapers Grows 16 Percent Year-Over-Year In December, Press Release, The Nielsen Company, viewed 24 August 2011, <http://nielsen.com/us/en/insights/press-room/2009/web_traffic_to_top.html>

Nielsen Online 2009, Web Traffic To Career Development Sites Increases 20 Percent Year Over Year in January, Press Release, The Nielsen Company, viewed 24 August 2011,
<http://nielsen.com/us/en/insights/press-room/2009/web_traffic_to_career.html>

Plunkett, J 2006, The Rise and Rise of YouTube, Media Guardian, viewed 24 August 2011,
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/sep/14/media.newmedia>